Today the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granted the federal government’s petition for rehearing en banc in Gun Owners of America v. Garland, a challenge to the federal government’s ban on bump stocks. In March, a divided panel of the Sixth Circuit invalidated the ban after concluding the federal government was not entitled to Chevron deference. This decision created a split with the Courts of Appeals for the Tenth and D.C. Circuits.

While this may seem like a gun rights case, the real action in GOA v. Garland concerns administrative law, and the application of the Chevron doctrine in particular. As I noted here, the original panel opinion concluded that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms’ interpretation of the relevant statutory language was not entitled to Chevron deference because such deference should not be available when an agency interprets a criminal statute. This is an important question of administrative law that the Sixth Circuit had engaged with before, and which the full court will now consider.

Read more at Reason