www.gunowners.org
Feb 1998
Look Who's Still Got Problems with
the Anti-gun Provisions of S. 10...
Provided by Gun Owners of America, Springfield, VA, (703)321-8585
Senator Conrad Burns (R-MT), December 1997
[S]ections of the bill [S. 10] contain provisions that
would infringe on an individual's Second Amendment rights.
Although, Senator Hatch has informed me that he intends to review
these sections, I do not feel that these modifications are
occurring quickly enough and have doubts that the changes will
protect our Second Amendment guarantees. For this reason, I have
removed my name as a co-sponsor of S. 10.
Senator Wayne Allard (R-CO), October 1997
I was an original cosponsor of the Juvenile Crime bill, S.
10, up until recently when I withdrew my support. While I
support the main intent of the bill, I was not comfortable with a
firearms provision that requires forfeiture to the federal
government of firearms suspected of being used in felonies or gun
trafficking. Passage of this provision would vastly enlarge
federal authority and potentially violate the Constitution, as
well as trigger enormous amounts of litigation over weapons
seizures.
Larry Pratt, Gun Owners of America, January 1998
Despite some minor changes, S. 10 is still unconstitutional and
continues to treat unsuspecting gun owners like organized crime figures.
The RICO provisions in the bill are extremely dangerous as they could be
used by Handgun Control, Inc. to bring lawsuits against gun dealers and
manufacturers -- all with the intent of crippling the gun industry.
The New Gun Week, August 1997
While Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT), chairman of the Senate
Judiciary Committee, has made some changes to S. 10, there are
other provisions which are of concern to gun owners. . . . As
written, however, S. 10, which was reported out of the Judiciary
Committee by a 12-6 vote, would impose a 20-year sentence for
minor mistakes involving . . . supervised handgun use by young
people.
Neal Knox, in Guns & Ammo, June 1997
Former [anti-gun] Sen. Howard Metzenbaum (D-OH) had tried
for years to make gun law violations a "predicate" for the
Racketeering law (the kind of offense that would allow the
often-abused RICO statutes to be invoked). Now Sen. Hatch picks
up Metzenbaums' banner in S. 3/S. 10.
The New Gun Week, May 1997
Making gun law violations a predicate for applying
racketeering law procedures, an idea once championed by arch
anti-gunner ex-Sen. Howard Metzenbaum, has found its way into two
crime bills sponsored by pro-gun Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch of
Utah. The concept which tramples on Fourth, Fifth and Sixth
Amendment protections is contained in both S. 3 and S. 10.
Joe Phillips, National Rifle Association, Sept. 1997
[S. 10] is not a perfect bill. There were a number of
things that were supposed to have been fixed in the final passage
of that bill . . . primarily in regard to violations under the
use of RICO offenses that were not taken out. . . . It [S. 10]
is not quite as good as portrayed at final passage of that bill.